The Poet in His Own Words

W. H. Auden with wine and cigarette

By Dr Neel Burton — Psychiatrist, philosopher, and wine writer; Fellow of Green Templeton College, University of Oxford; author of over twenty books.

W. H. Auden (1907–1973) was one of the great poets of the twentieth century: technically dazzling, psychologically acute, and unusually quotable.

His famously furrowed face seemed almost to embody the life he had lived. Auden himself described it best:

My face looks like a wedding-cake left out in the rain.

—Quoted in Humphrey Carpenter, W. H. Auden: A Biography

Auden had the poet’s gift of compressing a large and complicated truth into a handful of words. His own definition of poetry might equally serve as a definition of his genius:

Poetry might be defined as the clear expression of mixed feelings.

The Poet and the City, in The Dyer’s Hand

As a young man at Oxford, he told the aspiring poet Stephen Spender:

Art is born of humiliation.

—Stephen Spender, World Within World

Humiliation may puncture our pretensions, but it also reveals us to ourselves. In The Sea and the Mirror, Auden offers two brilliantly concise injunctions:

All that we are not stares back at what we are.

Learn from your dreams what you lack.

The Sea and the Mirror

He could be particularly sharp on reason, action, and their failure:

Those who will not reason
Perish in the act:
Those who will not act
Perish for that reason.

Under Which Lyre

And on fame:

Fame often makes a writer vain,
But seldom makes him proud.

Who’s Who

Auden was no less penetrating on self-deception. The person we pretend to be for ourselves, he observed, is not quite the person we pretend to be for others:

The image of myself which I try to create in my own mind in order that I may love myself is very different from the image which I try to create in the minds of others in order that they may love me.

Hic et Ille, in The Dyer’s Hand

He was hardly more sentimental about work:

A tremendous number of people in America work very hard at something that bores them. Even a rich man thinks he has to go down to the office every day. Not because he likes it but because he can’t think of anything else to do.

The Table Talk of W. H. Auden, 11 December 1946

Or about relationships:

Almost all of our relationships begin and most of them continue as forms of mutual exploitation, a mental or physical barter, to be terminated when one or both partners run out of goods.

The Poet and the City, in The Dyer’s Hand

A false enchantment can all too easily last a lifetime.

Enchantment, in A Certain World

But Auden’s wit and intelligence were grounded in a profound understanding of suffering. In Musée des Beaux Arts, inspired by Bruegel’s Landscape with the Fall of Icarus, he observes how private catastrophe unfolds amid the indifference of ordinary life:

About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters: how well they understood
Its human position.

Musée des Beaux Arts

His love poetry is no less clear-eyed. In Funeral Blues, love becomes an entire world—and grief its extinction:

He was my North, my South, my East and West,
My working week and my Sunday rest,
My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song;
I thought that love would last for ever: I was wrong.

Funeral Blues

Yet disenchantment did not make Auden cynical. If love could be unequal, the answer was not to love less:

If equal affection cannot be,
Let the more loving one be me.

The More Loving One

Auden’s genius lay in this marriage of disenchantment and affirmation. He saw vanity in fame, self-interest in relationships, indifference around suffering, and mortality within love—but still found reasons to create, to love, and, finally, to praise:

In the deserts of the heart
Let the healing fountain start,
In the prison of his days
Teach the free man how to praise.

In Memory of W. B. Yeats

Plato’s Prayer for Inner Beauty, Wisdom, and Temperance

Socrates and Phaedrus beneath a plane tree by the River Illisus outside Athens.

By Dr Neel Burton — Psychiatrist, philosopher, and wine writer; Fellow of Green Templeton College, University of Oxford; author of over twenty books.

Yesterday, I prepared dinner for some friends, and we recited the Socratic Prayer from Plato’s Phaedrus in lieu of grace, with one person taking the part of Socrates and another that of Phaedrus.

I think I shall be sticking with it: it is absolutely perfect for a dinner among friends.

Socrates: Beloved Pan, and all ye other gods who haunt this place, give me beauty in the inward soul; and may the outward and inward man be at one. May I reckon the wise to be the wealthy, and may I have such a quantity of gold as a temperate man and he only can bear and carry. Anything more? The prayer, I think, is enough for me.

Phaedrus: Ask the same for me, for friends should have all things in common.

Socrates: Let us go [eat].

The prayer comes at the very end of the Phaedrus. Socrates and Phaedrus have spent the afternoon outside the walls of Athens, conversing beneath a plane tree on love, beauty, the soul, rhetoric, and the written word. Before returning to the city, Socrates prays to Pan and the other gods of the place.

His prayer contains three closely related wishes.

First, he asks for beauty in the inward soul. Physical beauty is vulnerable to time and fortune, but beauty of soul—wisdom, goodness, harmony—is both more enduring and more truly our own.

Second, he asks that the outward and inward person be at one. This is a prayer for integrity: that our appearance and conduct should express, rather than conceal or contradict, our inner nature.

Third, he asks to count the wise as wealthy, and to possess no more gold than a temperate person can bear. True wealth lies not in having much, but in needing little—and in having the wisdom to know how much is enough.

Phaedrus then asks to share in the prayer, “for friends should have all things in common.” This final touch transforms a private aspiration into a shared ideal. What better grace could there be among friends?

Continue Exploring

To delve deeper into Socrates and Plato, see The Gang of Three: Socrates, Plato, Aristotle.

You may also enjoy

Explore all Socrates essays

Diogenes of Sinope or Diogenes the Cynic was a contemporary of Socrates’ pupil Plato, whom Plato described as ‘a Socrates gone mad’. Like Socrates and, to a lesser extent, Plato, Diogenes favoured direct verbal interaction over the written account. When a man called Hegesias asked to be lent one of his writing tablets, he replied, ‘You are a simpleton, Hegesias; you do not choose painted figs, but real ones; and yet you pass over the true training and would apply yourself to written rules.’ After being exiled from his native Sinope for having defaced its coinage, Diogenes moved to Athens, took up the life of a beggar, and made it his mission to metaphorically deface the coinage of custom and convention, which, he maintained, was the false coin of morality. He disdained the need for conventional shelter or any other such ‘dainties’ and elected to live in a tub and survive on a diet of onions. He proved to the later satisfaction of the Stoics that happiness has nothing whatever to do with a person’s material circumstances, and held that human beings had much to learn from studying the simplicity and artlessness of dogs, which, unlike human beings, had not ‘complicated every simple gift of the gods’. The terms ‘cynic’ and ‘cynical’ derive from the Greek kynikos, which is the adjective of kyon or ‘dog’.

Diogenes placed reason and nature firmly above custom and convention, which he held to be incompatible with happiness. It is natural for a human being to act in accord with reason, and reason dictates that a human being should live in accord with nature. Accordingly, he taught that, if an act is not shameful in private, then it should not be shameful in public either. Upon being challenged for masturbating in the marketplace, he replied, ‘If only it were so easy to soothe hunger by rubbing an empty belly’. Upon being asked, on another occasion, where he came from, he replied, ‘I am a citizen of the world’ (cosmopolites), a radical claim at the time and the first recorded use of the term ‘cosmopolitan’. Although Diogenes privileged reason, he despised the sort of abstract philosophy that was being practiced elsewhere and in particular at Plato’s Academy. When, to great acclaim, Plato defined a human being as an animal, biped, and featherless, Diogenes plucked a fowl and brought it to the Academy with the words, ‘Behold! I have brought you Plato’s man.’ Plato consequently revised his definition, adding to it ‘with broad nails’.

Diogenes was not impressed with his fellow men, not even with Alexander the Great, who came to meet him one morning while he was lying in the sunlight. When Alexander asked him whether there was any favour he might do for him, he replied, ‘Yes, stand out of my sunlight.’ Much to his credit, Alexander still declared, ‘If I were not Alexander, then I should wish to be Diogenes.’ In another account of the conversation, Alexander found Diogenes looking attentively at a pile of human bones. Diogenes explained, ‘I am searching for the bones of your father (King Philip of Macedon), but cannot distinguish them from those of a slave.’ Diogenes used to stroll about in broad daylight with a lamp. Whenever curious people asked him what he was doing, he would reply, ‘I am just looking for a human being.’ Much to his chagrin, all he ever found were rascals and scoundrels. When asked how he wished to be buried, he left instructions to be thrown outside the city wall so that wild animals could feast upon his body. After his death in the city of Corinth, the Corinthians erected to his memory a pillar upon which they rested a dog of Parian marble. Diogenes taught by living example that wisdom and happiness belong to the person who is independent of society. He was, I think, a shining example of the art of failure.